Stainless Steel 304 / 304L & 316 / 316L Material & Sourcing Guide
Practical, engineer-level handbook for choosing between 304 / 304L and 316 / 316L in process equipment, marine hardware and hygienic applications. Prepared by Sunhyings materials engineers.
- Side-by-side comparison of chemistry, properties and corrosion behaviour.
- When 304/304L is sufficient – and when you really need 316/316L.
- Guidance for purchasers: typical standards, product forms and documentation.
1. Material Overview: 304 / 304L vs 316 / 316L in One Page
Austenitic stainless steels 304 / 304L and 316 / 316L are by far the most widely used grades in process equipment, pipelines and fabricated stainless structures.
In simple terms:
- 304 / 304L is the “workhorse” grade for many indoor and mildly corrosive environments, offering a good balance of cost, corrosion resistance and fabricability.
- 316 / 316L adds molybdenum (Mo), significantly improving resistance to chlorides (salt, de-icing chemicals, many process streams) and certain chemicals – at a higher alloy and purchase cost.
- The L variants (304L, 316L) limit carbon to ≤0.03% to improve resistance to weld sensitisation and intergranular corrosion in welded heavy sections.
For Sunhyings customers, material selection is usually a trade-off between corrosion risk, life-cycle cost and code compliance. This guide is written to help engineers and buyers justify that decision with clear technical reasoning.
2. Chemistry & International Designations
Both 304 and 316 are chromium-nickel austenitic stainless steels. The key difference is the deliberate addition of 2–3% Mo in 316 / 316L, plus slight adjustments to Ni to maintain the austenitic structure.
2.1 Designations at a glance
| Grade family | UNS | EN | Common names |
|---|---|---|---|
| 304 | S30400 | 1.4301 | 304, X5CrNi18-10 |
| 304L | S30403 | 1.4307 | 304L, low-carbon 304 |
| 316 | S31600 | 1.4401 | 316, X5CrNiMo17-12-2 |
| 316L | S31603 | 1.4404 | 316L, low-carbon 316 |
2.2 Typical chemical composition ranges (% by weight)
| Element | 304 / 304L | 316 / 316L | Technical function |
|---|---|---|---|
| Carbon (C) | ≤0.07 (304), ≤0.03 (304L) | ≤0.08 (316), ≤0.03 (316L) | Strength contributor; lower C reduces weld sensitisation. |
| Chromium (Cr) | 17.5–19.5 | 16.5–18.5 | Forms passive Cr₂O₃ film; baseline stainless behaviour. |
| Nickel (Ni) | 8.0–10.5 | 10.0–13.0 | Stabilises austenite; improves toughness and acid resistance. |
| Molybdenum (Mo) | – | 2.0–2.5 (typical) | Raises pitting/crevice corrosion resistance in chlorides. |
| Manganese (Mn) | ≤2.0 | ≤2.0 | Improves hot workability; secondary austenite former. |
| Silicon (Si) | ≤1.0 | ≤1.0 | Deoxidiser during steelmaking. |
| Nitrogen (N) | ≤0.11 | ≤0.11 | Interstitial strengthener; also contributes to pitting resistance. |
Note: Many plates are supplied dual-certified (e.g. 304/304L or 316/316L), combining low-carbon weldability with the minimum strength of the parent grade. Always confirm on the MTC if you have strict code requirements.
3. Mechanical & Physical Properties
Both grade families share the characteristic high toughness and ductility of austenitic stainless steels. At room temperature, mechanical properties in solution-annealed plate are broadly comparable, with 316 often showing slightly higher tensile strength in practice.
3.1 Typical mechanical properties (plate, room temperature)
| Property | 304 / 304L | 316 / 316L | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|
| Tensile strength Rm | ≥520 MPa | ≥515 MPa | Mill results often 550–650 MPa for both families. |
| 0.2% proof strength Rp0.2 | ≥205 MPa | ≥205 MPa | Design codes use conservative allowable stresses. |
| Elongation A50 | ≥40% | ≥40% | Excellent ductility for forming and deep drawing. |
| Hardness (Brinell) | ≤215 HB (typical limits) | ≤217 HB (typical limits) | Cold work can increase hardness substantially. |
3.2 Physical properties (typical)
| Property | 304 / 304L | 316 / 316L | Unit |
|---|---|---|---|
| Density | ≈ 8.0 | ≈ 8.0 | g/cm³ |
| Thermal conductivity (20°C) | ≈ 16 | ≈ 16 | W/m·K |
| Coefficient of expansion (20–100°C) | ≈ 17.3 | ≈ 16.0 | µm/m·°C |
| Electrical resistivity | ≈ 0.73 | ≈ 0.74 | µΩ·m |
| Magnetic permeability (annealed) | < 1.05 | < 1.05 | µr |
In fully solution-annealed condition, both grade families are essentially non-magnetic. Cold work (bending, forming) can introduce slight magnetism without significantly affecting corrosion resistance.
4. Corrosion Behaviour in Real Environments
The most important practical difference is corrosion resistance – especially in chloride-bearing environments (sea salt, de-icing salts, many process streams, cleaning chemicals).
4.1 Pitting & crevice corrosion (chlorides)
Engineers often use the Pitting Resistance Equivalent Number (PREN) as a quick indicator:
PREN ≈ %Cr + 3.3 × %Mo + 16 × %N
- 304 / 304L typically gives PREN around 18–20.
- 316 / 316L, with Mo, typically gives PREN around 24–26.
In practice this means:
- For dry indoor environments and many mildly corrosive services, 304L is completely adequate.
- In coastal atmospheres, splash zones, salt-spray areas or hot chloride cleaning solutions, 316L usually offers significantly better margin against pitting and tea-staining.
- In warm, stagnant seawater or heavily contaminated crevices, even 316L can still pit; duplex or higher-alloy grades may be needed.
4.2 Intergranular corrosion & the role of “L” grades
When welded material spends time in the 425–860°C range, chromium carbides can precipitate at grain boundaries, locally depleting Cr and creating paths for intergranular attack. This is called weld sensitisation.
- 304L and 316L limit carbon to 0.03% max, minimising carbide formation and providing much better resistance to intergranular corrosion in welded heavy sections, without needing post-weld solution annealing in most thicknesses.
4.3 Stress corrosion cracking (SCC)
All austenitic stainless steels, including 304L and 316L, can suffer chloride stress corrosion cracking when tensile stress + chlorides + elevated temperature (usually >60°C) act together. 316L is somewhat better than 304L, but SCC risk remains. For high-risk combinations, duplex stainless steels are normally preferred.
5. How to Decide: 304L or 316L for Your Project?
Many buyers ask a simple question: “Can I save cost by staying with 304L, or do I really need 316L?” The answer depends on the medium, temperature, environment and cleaning regime.
5.1 Situations where 304 / 304L is usually sufficient
- Indoor process equipment in dry, clean industrial atmospheres.
- Food & beverage equipment handling low-chloride products at moderate temperatures (for example many dry foods, sugar, beer, milk).
- Architectural components not exposed to sea spray or de-icing salts, with reasonable cleaning.
- Structural brackets, frames and supports where cosmetic appearance is important but exposure is mild.
5.2 Situations where 316 / 316L is strongly recommended
- Coastal and offshore environments (marine hardware, ladders, cable trays, coastal façade panels).
- Equipment exposed to chloride-bearing cleaning chemicals or CIP media at elevated temperature.
- Process streams containing chlorides, reducing acids or fertiliser solutions where 304L test coupons show early pitting.
- High-value installations where downtime or repair access is difficult and a conservative corrosion allowance is justified.
Sunhyings can review your actual service conditions – not just the alloy name – to recommend whether 304L or 316L is the more economical choice over the whole life of the equipment.
6. Fabrication & Welding Considerations
304L and 316L behave very similarly in workshop operations. Both are readily formed, machined and welded with appropriate procedures.
6.1 Welding
- Suitable for all common processes (TIG/GTAW, MIG/GMAW, MMA/SMAW, SAW).
- Use matching low-carbon filler metals (e.g. 308L for 304L, 316L / 316LSi for 316L) to maintain corrosion resistance in the weld metal.
- Control heat input and interpass temperature to avoid excessive distortion and preserve toughness.
- Thorough post-weld cleaning (pickling, passivation, removal of heat tint) is essential to restore full corrosion resistance, especially in aggressive environments.
6.2 Machining & forming
- Both families work-harden more rapidly than carbon steel. Use sharp tools, positive feed and adequate cutting fluids.
- For deep drawing or complex forming, generous radii and polished tools help reduce galling and surface damage.
- Cold-worked areas will have increased strength and hardness and may show slight magnetism.
7. Typical Applications for 304L & 316L
Both grade families appear side-by-side across many industries. In practice, the “right” choice is often a mixed strategy: 304L for less exposed parts, 316L where chloride or chemical attack is concentrated.
General industry (304L)
Tanks, hoppers, ducting, frames, platforms, enclosures and many components in clean industrial atmospheres where corrosion risk is moderate and easy to visually inspect.
Marine & coastal (316L)
Handrails, ladders, splash-zone piping, cable trays, dock hardware and façade elements exposed to salt spray or coastal winds.
Food & beverage (304L / 316L)
304L widely used for many food contact surfaces; 316L preferred for brine, sauces with higher salt content, vinegar, and hot CIP systems.
Pharma & biotech (316L)
316L is the de-facto standard for high-purity water systems, sanitary pipework and vessels requiring repeated SIP/CIP cycles.
8. Quality Assurance, MTCs & Supply Scope from Sunhyings
For B2B projects, documentation and traceability are just as important as the material itself. Sunhyings maintains a controlled supply chain with mill-backed documentation suitable for export projects.
- Standards: ASTM A240 / A480, ASME SA240, EN 10088-2, EN 10028-7, GB/T 3280 as required by project.
- MTCs: EN 10204 3.1 Mill Test Certificates with full chemistry and mechanical test data, linked to heat numbers and plate markings.
- Product forms: Hot rolled plate (No.1), cold rolled sheet & coil (2B, BA), strip and blanks cut to drawing (laser, plasma, waterjet), with optional surface protection films.
- Processing services: Cutting to size, edge preparation, basic forming and packing tailored to sea or land transport.
9. FAQ – 304 / 304L vs 316 / 316L
316 / 316L has better resistance to chlorides and some chemicals, but it is not automatically the best choice everywhere. In mild indoor environments, 304L often performs perfectly at lower cost. “Better” should be evaluated against your real environment, lifetime and budget.
Where welding is involved – especially for thicker plate, pressure equipment or critical service – Sunhyings generally recommends 304L or 316L. The low carbon level reduces the risk of weld sensitisation and intergranular corrosion without a major cost penalty for most markets.
“Stainless” means much more resistant to corrosion than carbon steel, not completely immune in every environment. Tea-staining, pitting or rust staining can occur if the wrong grade is used, surfaces are rough, or deposits are allowed to build up. Correct grade selection plus good design and cleaning are all important.
No. Both are austenitic grades and cannot be hardened by quench and temper. Strength can be increased by cold working. Solution annealing is used to restore corrosion resistance and relieve work hardening, not to create a hardened martensitic structure.
10. Downloads & Talk to a Sunhyings Engineer
Need help deciding between 304L and 316L for a specific project? Share your medium, temperature, pressure and environment, and our materials team will review and suggest practical plate and coil specs.
Downloadable resources
- 304 / 304L & 316 / 316L Technical Datasheet (PDF)
- Surface Finish Guide for Stainless Steel Plate & Coil
- Fabrication & Welding Checklist for Austenitic Stainless Steels