{"id":14607,"date":"2026-10-29T14:52:12","date_gmt":"2026-10-29T06:52:12","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/sunhyings.com\/?p=14607"},"modified":"2026-10-29T14:52:12","modified_gmt":"2026-10-29T06:52:12","slug":"bearing-type-vs-slip-critical-structural-connections-what-buyers-must-specify","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/sunhyings.com\/fr\/blog\/bearing-type-vs-slip-critical-structural-connections-what-buyers-must-specify\/","title":{"rendered":"Assemblages structuraux \u00e0 serrage contr\u00f4l\u00e9 ou \u00e0 plat sur appui : ce que l'acheteur doit sp\u00e9cifier"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<style>\n.sunhy-blog-article{max-width:860px;margin:0 auto;color:#25313d;line-height:1.75;overflow-wrap:break-word}\n.sunhy-blog-article p{margin:0 0 1.15em}\n.sunhy-blog-article h2{font-size:clamp(1.45rem,2.3vw,1.9rem);line-height:1.3;margin:2em 0 .75em;color:#1d3448}\n.sunhy-blog-article h3{font-size:clamp(1.15rem,1.85vw,1.35rem);line-height:1.4;margin:1.55em 0 .7em;color:#24445a}\n.sunhy-blog-article .sunhy-table-wrap{width:100%;max-width:100%;overflow-x:auto;overscroll-behavior-x:contain;margin:1.4em 0 1.1em}\n.sunhy-blog-article table{border-collapse:collapse;width:100%;min-width:650px;font-size:.94em;line-height:1.5}\n.sunhy-blog-article th,.sunhy-blog-article td{border:1px solid #d6e0e7;padding:12px 14px;text-align:left;vertical-align:top}\n.sunhy-blog-article thead th{background:#edf3f6;font-weight:700;color:#1c3445}\n.sunhy-blog-article tbody tr:nth-child(even){background:#f8fafc}\n.sunhy-blog-article .sunhy-table-note{font-size:.9em;color:#536372;margin-top:0}\n.sunhy-blog-article a{text-decoration:underline;text-underline-offset:2px}\n.sunhy-blog-article a:focus-visible,.sunhy-blog-article .sunhy-table-wrap:focus-visible{outline:3px solid #367eac;outline-offset:3px}\n@media(max-width:600px){.sunhy-blog-article{line-height:1.68}.sunhy-blog-article h2{margin-top:1.7em}.sunhy-blog-article th,.sunhy-blog-article td{padding:10px 12px}}\n.sunhy-blog-article{font-family:Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif;color:#243646;font-size:16px;line-height:1.78;max-width:1180px;margin:0 auto;overflow-wrap:anywhere}\n.sunhy-blog-article *{box-sizing:border-box}.sunhy-blog-article p{margin:0 0 18px}.sunhy-blog-article h2{font-size:28px;line-height:1.35;color:#12354f;margin:42px 0 20px;padding:12px 16px;background:#f1f6fa;border-left:4px solid #27658d;border-radius:0 7px 7px 0;scroll-margin-top:100px}.sunhy-blog-article h3{font-size:21px;line-height:1.4;color:#244c69;margin:28px 0 13px}.sunhy-blog-article a{color:#155f91;text-underline-offset:3px}.sunhy-blog-article a:hover{color:#103c5b}.sunhy-blog-article a:focus-visible{outline:3px solid #d39a36;outline-offset:4px}.sunhy-blog-article li{margin:7px 0}.sunhy-blog-article ul,.sunhy-blog-article ol{padding-inline-start:24px}\n.sunhy-blog-article .sunhy-summary-box,.sunhy-blog-article .sunhy-warning-box,.sunhy-blog-article .sunhy-procurement-note,.sunhy-blog-article .sunhy-related-reading,.sunhy-blog-article .sunhy-cta{padding:24px;border-radius:10px;margin:26px 0;border:1px solid #d4e1eb}.sunhy-blog-article .sunhy-summary-box{background:#edf5fb;border-left:5px solid #28648a}.sunhy-blog-article .sunhy-box-label{display:block;font-size:13px;font-weight:700;letter-spacing:.08em;text-transform:uppercase;color:#275b7f;margin:0 0 10px}.sunhy-blog-article .sunhy-summary-box p:last-child,.sunhy-blog-article .sunhy-warning-box p:last-child,.sunhy-blog-article .sunhy-procurement-note p:last-child,.sunhy-blog-article .sunhy-cta p:last-child{margin-bottom:0}.sunhy-blog-article .sunhy-warning-box{background:#fff8ec;border-color:#edddbc;border-left:5px solid #bc842d}.sunhy-blog-article .sunhy-warning-box .sunhy-box-label{color:#7d5418}.sunhy-blog-article .sunhy-procurement-note,.sunhy-blog-article .sunhy-cta{background:#12354f;color:#f5f8fb;border:0}.sunhy-blog-article .sunhy-procurement-note a,.sunhy-blog-article .sunhy-cta a{color:#a9dffa}.sunhy-blog-article .sunhy-toc{background:#f7f9fb;border:1px solid #dce5ec;border-radius:10px;padding:22px 26px;margin:26px 0}.sunhy-blog-article .sunhy-toc-title{font-size:17px;color:#183f5d;margin:0 0 10px;font-weight:700}.sunhy-blog-article .sunhy-toc ol{margin:0;padding-inline-start:22px;columns:2;column-gap:30px}.sunhy-blog-article .sunhy-toc li{break-inside:avoid;margin:7px 0;line-height:1.5}\n.sunhy-blog-article .sunhy-table-wrap{width:100%;max-width:100%;overflow-x:auto;margin:25px 0;border:1px solid #d8e2eb;border-radius:9px;-webkit-overflow-scrolling:touch}.sunhy-blog-article .sunhy-table-wrap table{width:100%;min-width:640px;margin:0;border-collapse:collapse;font-size:15px}.sunhy-blog-article .sunhy-table-wrap th,.sunhy-blog-article .sunhy-table-wrap td{padding:14px 16px;vertical-align:top;line-height:1.6;border-bottom:1px solid #dce5eb}.sunhy-blog-article .sunhy-table-wrap thead th{background:#183f5c;color:#fff;text-align:start;font-weight:700}.sunhy-blog-article .sunhy-table-wrap tbody tr:nth-child(even){background:#f3f7fa}.sunhy-blog-article .sunhy-table-wrap tbody tr:last-child td{border-bottom:0}.sunhy-blog-article blockquote{background:#f3f7fa;border-inline-start:4px solid #849fb3;margin:24px 0;padding:20px 24px}.sunhy-blog-article blockquote p:last-child{margin:0}.sunhy-blog-article .sunhy-equation{padding:18px 22px;background:#eef4f8;border:1px solid #d6e3ec;border-radius:8px}\n.sunhy-blog-article .sunhy-editorial-figure{margin:30px 0}.sunhy-blog-article .sunhy-editorial-figure img{display:block;width:100%;height:auto;aspect-ratio:3\/2;object-fit:contain;background:#eaf0f4;border-radius:10px}.sunhy-blog-article .sunhy-editorial-figure figcaption{font-size:13px;line-height:1.65;color:#617685;padding:11px 3px}.sunhy-blog-article .sunhy-related-reading{background:#f4f8fb}.sunhy-blog-article .sunhy-related-reading ul{margin:0}.sunhy-blog-article .sunhy-reference-box{border-top:1px solid #dce5eb;background:#f8fafb;padding:22px;margin:32px 0;border-radius:8px;font-size:14px}.sunhy-blog-article .sunhy-reference-box h2{font-size:22px;background:none;border:0;padding:0;margin-top:0}\n@media(max-width:767px){.sunhy-blog-article{font-size:16px;line-height:1.75}.sunhy-blog-article h2{font-size:23px;margin-top:32px;padding:10px 13px}.sunhy-blog-article h3{font-size:19px}.sunhy-blog-article .sunhy-toc ol{columns:1}.sunhy-blog-article .sunhy-summary-box,.sunhy-blog-article .sunhy-warning-box,.sunhy-blog-article .sunhy-procurement-note,.sunhy-blog-article .sunhy-related-reading,.sunhy-blog-article .sunhy-cta,.sunhy-blog-article .sunhy-toc{padding:19px}.sunhy-blog-article .sunhy-table-wrap th,.sunhy-blog-article .sunhy-table-wrap td{padding:11px 13px}}\n\n.sunhy-blog-article .sunhy-faq details{border:1px solid #d4e1eb;border-radius:8px;background:#f7fafc;padding:17px 20px;margin:12px 0}.sunhy-blog-article .sunhy-faq summary{cursor:pointer;font-weight:700;color:#183f5c;line-height:1.5}.sunhy-blog-article .sunhy-faq details p{margin:14px 0 0}.sunhy-blog-article .sunhy-faq summary:focus-visible{outline:3px solid #bc842d;outline-offset:4px}\n<\/style>\n<article class=\"sunhy-blog-article\">\n<aside class=\"sunhy-summary-box sunhy-added\" aria-label=\"Quick answer\"><p class=\"sunhy-box-label\">Quick answer<\/p><p>Bearing-type and slip-critical structural connections are not two different grades of bolts. They describe different requirements for how a bolted joint transfers shear and whether movement between the connected steel surfaces must be prevented.<\/p><\/aside><nav class=\"sunhy-toc sunhy-added\" aria-label=\"Article contents\"><p class=\"sunhy-toc-title\">In this guide<\/p><ol><li><a href=\"#how-bearing-type-and-slip-critical-connections-transfer-load\">How Bearing-Type and Slip-Critical Connections Transfer Load<\/a><\/li><li><a href=\"#when-does-the-engineer-require-a-slip-critical-joint\">When Does the Engineer Require a Slip-Critical Joint?<\/a><\/li><li><a href=\"#why-hole-geometry-and-faying-surfaces-change-the-specification\">Why Hole Geometry and Faying Surfaces Change the Specification<\/a><\/li><li><a href=\"#what-changes-in-bolting-assemblies-installation-and-inspection\">What Changes in Bolting Assemblies, Installation and Inspection?<\/a><\/li><li><a href=\"#how-to-write-an-rfq-without-changing-the-approved-joint-design\">How to Write an RFQ Without Changing the Approved Joint Design<\/a><\/li><li><a href=\"#sunhy-faq-14607\">Frequently asked questions<\/a><\/li><\/ol><\/nav>\n<p>In a <strong>bearing-type connection<\/strong>, the design relies on bolt shear strength and bearing resistance at the bolt holes rather than on a specified frictional resistance between the plates. In a <strong>slip-critical connection<\/strong>, pretensioned bolts clamp prepared contact surfaces\u2014called <em>faying surfaces<\/em>\u2014together so that friction resists the specified shear load before slip occurs. The joint must also satisfy the applicable bolt shear, tension and connected-material bearing limit states.<\/p>\n<p>For buyers, the distinction affects more than the bolt quotation. It determines which connection designation, bolt assembly, hole arrangement, surface condition, installation procedure and inspection requirements must be transferred from the approved structural design into the procurement documents. The Engineer of Record (EOR), not the buyer or bolt supplier, is responsible for the engineering decisions.<\/p>\n<h2 id=\"how-bearing-type-and-slip-critical-connections-transfer-load\">How Bearing-Type and Slip-Critical Connections Transfer Load<\/h2>\n<p>Consider two steel plates connected by high-strength bolts and subjected to an in-plane shear force.<\/p>\n<p>In a bearing-type joint, friction may initially resist movement, especially if the bolts have been pretensioned. However, that friction is not the basis of the specified shear resistance. Relative movement can bring the bolt shank into bearing against the hole wall, after which load is transferred through bolt shear and bearing of the connected material. The designer checks the relevant strength and deformation limit states rather than relying on an assumed slip coefficient.<\/p>\n<p>A slip-critical joint is designed differently. The bolt pretension generates clamping force normal to the faying surfaces. Their frictional resistance then opposes movement parallel to those surfaces. If slip would compromise the required performance of the connection, the design must provide adequate slip resistance at the applicable load level.<\/p>\n<aside class=\"sunhy-warning-box sunhy-added\" aria-label=\"Important specification check\"><p class=\"sunhy-box-label\">Important specification check<\/p><p>This does not mean a slip-critical joint can ignore the strength of the bolts or the surrounding steel. Under the June 2025 RCSC specification, slip-critical joints must also satisfy the applicable strength requirements for bearing-type connections. <strong>Slip resistance is an additional design requirement, not a replacement for bolt shear and bearing checks.<\/strong><\/p><\/aside>\n<h3>Bearing-type does not necessarily mean snug-tightened<\/h3>\n<p>One important distinction is often lost when purchase orders use the terms <em>bearing-type<\/em> and <em>snug-tight<\/em> interchangeably.<\/p>\n<p>RCSC 2025 recognizes three joint types for the relevant structural bolting applications:<\/p>\n<div class=\"sunhy-table-wrap\" role=\"region\" aria-label=\"Comparison of structural bolted joint types\" tabindex=\"0\">\n<table>\n<thead><tr><th scope=\"col\">Joint type<\/th><th scope=\"col\">Basis for resisting shear<\/th><th scope=\"col\">Required bolt condition<\/th><th scope=\"col\">Faying-surface requirement<\/th><\/tr><\/thead>\n<tbody>\n<tr><td>Snug-tightened (ST)<\/td><td>Bolt shear and connected-material bearing<\/td><td>Specified minimum pretension is not required<\/td><td>No slip-resistance surface classification solely because the joint is ST<\/td><\/tr>\n<tr><td>Pretensioned (PT)<\/td><td>Bolt shear and connected-material bearing<\/td><td>Specified minimum pretension is required<\/td><td>Qualified slip-resisting surfaces are not required solely because the joint is PT<\/td><\/tr>\n<tr><td>Slip-critical (SC)<\/td><td>Frictional resistance to specified slip, plus applicable connection strength checks<\/td><td>Specified minimum pretension is required<\/td><td>Faying surfaces must satisfy the applicable slip-critical requirements<\/td><\/tr>\n<\/tbody><\/table><\/div>\n<p class=\"sunhy-table-note\"><em>Comparison based on RCSC 2025 Section 4 and Table 4.1 for the relevant shear or combined shear-and-tension applications. Tension-only joints have separate provisions.<\/em><\/p>\n<p>A pretensioned joint can therefore remain a bearing-type joint. For example, pretension may be required because of a particular fatigue or load condition even when the design does not require the joint to resist shear through qualified faying-surface friction.<\/p>\n<p>That distinction has a direct procurement consequence. Ordering an ASTM F3125 structural bolt and requesting a pretensioned installation does not, by itself, establish a slip-critical connection. The approved design must also define the necessary slip-resistance requirements.<\/p>\n<p>Conversely, specifying a slip-critical connection does not simply mean purchasing a stronger bolt. Bolt strength, minimum pretension, surface condition and hole arrangement contribute to different parts of the engineering assessment. None can automatically replace the others.<\/p>\n<h2 id=\"when-does-the-engineer-require-a-slip-critical-joint\">When Does the Engineer Require a Slip-Critical Joint?<\/h2>\n<p>The practical question is whether slip at the connection can be tolerated under the applicable design requirements.<\/p>\n<p>For a bearing-type joint, some relative movement may occur before the bolts bear against the holes. Whether that movement is acceptable depends on the connection geometry, loading and structural performance requirements. In many applications, the designer can provide adequate strength without requiring slip-critical behavior.<\/p>\n<p>In other situations, even limited movement may be unacceptable. The concern may be structural displacement, fatigue performance, connection stability or the assumptions used in the analysis.<\/p>\n<p>RCSC 2025 Section 4.3 identifies circumstances requiring slip-critical joints for connections involving shear or combined shear and tension. These include fatigue loading with reversal of the loading direction, oversized holes, certain slotted-hole arrangements, and cases where slip at the faying surfaces would adversely affect structural performance.<\/p>\n<p>The details matter.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Fatigue loading is not one uniform condition.<\/strong> RCSC distinguishes fatigue with load-direction reversal from fatigue without reversal. For the latter, the commentary recognizes design alternatives involving pretensioned or slip-critical joints, with different fatigue design bases. A buyer cannot infer the required joint type simply because a drawing mentions cyclic loading.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Slotted holes also require a geometric distinction.<\/strong> RCSC 2025 Section 4.3 contains an exception to its slotted-hole slip-critical requirement where the applied load is approximately perpendicular\u2014within 80\u00b0 to 100\u00b0\u2014to the long dimension of the slot. That exception does not eliminate other applicable design requirements or the need for engineering approval of certain hole configurations.<\/p>\n<p>This matters because a slotted hole aligned with the direction of loading can permit substantially different movement from one loaded across the slot. A purchasing description such as &#8220;slotted holes permitted&#8221; is insufficient to establish how the joint is intended to behave.<\/p>\n<p>A similar distinction applies to vibration. The presence of vibrating equipment does not, by itself, define the connection as slip-critical. The actual loading, potential reversal, required pretension and consequences of slip must be evaluated against the governing design provisions.<\/p>\n<h3>What the EOR must decide<\/h3>\n<p>Under RCSC 2025 Section 1.6, the EOR is responsible for specifying the joint type when it is other than snug-tightened. For slip-critical joints, the required class of slip resistance must also be identified. The specification separately identifies required bolting group and type information, optional design selections and conditions that need written engineering approval.<\/p>\n<p>That division of responsibility is important when a quotation contains a missing field.<\/p>\n<p>If a drawing identifies a connection as slip-critical but does not identify the required slip-resistance class, the buyer should request clarification. Selecting Class A or Class B from a supplier catalog would amount to making an engineering decision that belongs to the approved design.<\/p>\n<p>The same principle applies when a supplier proposes a different hole arrangement, bolt assembly configuration or installation approach. Some substitutions require the EOR&#8217;s written approval under the applicable specification. They should not be accepted solely because the proposed components appear mechanically similar.<\/p>\n<p class=\"sunhy-engineering-example sunhy-added\" data-example=\"1\">Consider an illustrative connection that moves in service after bolts with a higher grade are installed. If the design requires slip resistance, bolt grade alone has not established the necessary faying-surface and pretension conditions. Revisit the approved joint classification, inspect the specified surfaces and resolve the installation evidence. Do not redesign the connection from a fastener catalog label.<\/p>\n\n<figure class=\"sunhy-editorial-figure sunhy-added\"><img loading=\"lazy\" src=\"https:\/\/sunhyings.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/10\/bridge-steelwork-structural-bolts-sunhy.webp\" alt=\"Steel bridge connection with rows of structural bolt assemblies\" width=\"1536\" height=\"1024\" loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"wp-image-14634\" title=\"Bearing type vs slip critical connections \u2014 illustrative inspection view\" srcset=\"https:\/\/sunhyings.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/10\/bridge-steelwork-structural-bolts-sunhy.webp 1536w, https:\/\/sunhyings.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/10\/bridge-steelwork-structural-bolts-sunhy-800x533.webp 800w, https:\/\/sunhyings.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/10\/bridge-steelwork-structural-bolts-sunhy-1024x683.webp 1024w, https:\/\/sunhyings.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/10\/bridge-steelwork-structural-bolts-sunhy-768x512.webp 768w, https:\/\/sunhyings.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/10\/bridge-steelwork-structural-bolts-sunhy-18x12.webp 18w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 1536px) 100vw, 1536px\" \/><figcaption>Steel bridge connection with rows of structural bolt assemblies. Illustrative arrangement; appearance does not establish grade or product conformity.<\/figcaption><\/figure><h2 id=\"why-hole-geometry-and-faying-surfaces-change-the-specification\">Why Hole Geometry and Faying Surfaces Change the Specification<\/h2>\n<p>A correct bolt grade cannot compensate for a faying surface that does not satisfy the approved slip-critical design requirements.<\/p>\n<p>That is because the slip-resistance mechanism depends on the interaction of bolt clamping force, the friction characteristics of the contact surfaces and the actual connection geometry.<\/p>\n<p>Under RCSC 2025 Section 5.4, the nominal slip-resistance calculation accounts for more than a nominal bolt strength. Relevant terms include the specified minimum bolt pretension, mean slip coefficient, number of slip planes, applicable filler effects, hole configuration and other design factors. When combined shear and tension acts on the joint, additional adjustments may be necessary.<\/p>\n<p>The commonly referenced surface classes under RCSC 2025 have the following design values:<\/p>\n<div class=\"sunhy-table-wrap\" role=\"region\" aria-label=\"RCSC 2025 faying surface classifications\" tabindex=\"0\"><table>\n<thead><tr><th scope=\"col\">RCSC 2025 surface classification<\/th><th scope=\"col\">Mean slip coefficient used for design<\/th><th scope=\"col\">Examples within the specified conditions<\/th><\/tr><\/thead>\n<tbody>\n<tr><td>Class A<\/td><td>0.30<\/td><td>Clean mill-scale steel, qualifying Class A coatings, or qualifying hot-dip galvanized faying surfaces<\/td><\/tr>\n<tr><td>Class B<\/td><td>0.50<\/td><td>Unpainted blast-cleaned steel or qualifying Class B coatings on blast-cleaned steel<\/td><\/tr>\n<\/tbody><\/table><\/div>\n<p>These are specification-defined reference values, not measured results for an unidentified supplier&#8217;s coating. They must be applied with the surface definitions, qualification requirements and design conditions in the governing specification. A coating described commercially as &#8220;high friction&#8221; cannot be assigned Class B merely from that description.<\/p>\n<p>Hole type also affects the engineering calculation. The design provisions distinguish standard, oversized and slotted-hole configurations rather than treating all bolt holes as interchangeable. The buyer therefore needs the approved hole type and any relevant orientation or thread-position requirements, not merely the nominal bolt diameter.<\/p>\n<h3>A shop primer is not automatically a qualified slip-critical coating<\/h3>\n<p>For coated slip-critical faying surfaces, RCSC 2025 Section 3.2.2 generally requires the appropriate blast-cleaned substrate and a coating qualified under Appendix A. The qualification relates to defined coating and application conditions, including the relevant slip-resistance performance.<\/p>\n<p>Coating cure is particularly important. The specification requires the coating to reach the applicable curing condition before the joint is assembled. A surface assembled too early may behave differently from the surface used during qualification.<\/p>\n<p>Unqualified coating or overspray is also controlled within designated faying-surface areas. This means that an otherwise ordinary shop-painting operation can create a connection acceptance issue if paint reaches an area that must remain uncoated or otherwise qualified for the specified joint.<\/p>\n<p>Hot-dip galvanized faying surfaces require a separate reading of the specification. RCSC 2025 designates applicable surfaces galvanized in accordance with ASTM A123 as Class A and prohibits hand or power wire brushing of those surfaces. This should not be confused with the coating specification for the bolts themselves, which is a separate component procurement issue.<\/p>\n<p>The distinction between these surfaces is easy to miss: a bolt may have an approved corrosion-protective finish while the steel plates it connects have a different, separately controlled surface preparation. One coating specification does not establish compliance for both.<\/p>\n<h3>Hypothetical procurement example: correct bolts, unresolved surfaces<\/h3>\n<p>Assume an approved steel splice drawing identifies a slip-critical joint with oversized holes and Class B faying surfaces. The fastener quotation offers the specified structural bolt assembly, including its corresponding nuts and washers.<\/p>\n<p>The steel fabrication proposal, however, identifies a general shop primer without documentation establishing that the primer and its application conditions qualify for the required Class B slip resistance.<\/p>\n<p>The bolt quotation alone does not resolve the discrepancy. Even if the supplied fasteners meet their applicable product specifications, the available information does not establish that the proposed faying surfaces meet the approved joint design.<\/p>\n<p>The buyer should request the relevant coating qualification and fabrication details or seek an EOR-approved change. The proper response is not to assume that the primer is acceptable, substitute a higher-strength bolt, or classify the joint as bearing-type.<\/p>\n<p>This is an illustrative specification conflict, not a recorded customer project or tested connection. Its purpose is to demonstrate why bolt procurement and steelwork surface preparation must be coordinated.<\/p>\n<h2 id=\"what-changes-in-bolting-assemblies-installation-and-inspection\">What Changes in Bolting Assemblies, Installation and Inspection?<\/h2>\n<p>The connection type determines installation and verification obligations, but it does not automatically identify every component that should appear on a purchase order.<\/p>\n<p>A structural bolt must first be specified as a product. For projects using the ASTM system, ASTM F3125\/F3125M addresses high-strength <a href=\"https:\/\/sunhyings.com\/fasteners\/bolts\/structural-bolts\/\">structural bolts<\/a> and assemblies within its stated product scope. Its publicly listed 2026 edition establishes the current publisher catalog identity, but a project may contractually reference a different edition. In fact, RCSC 2025 cites ASTM F3125\/F3125M-25 among its referenced standards.<\/p>\n<p>Buyers must therefore distinguish <strong>the published edition, the edition referenced by the joint specification, and the edition governing the actual contract<\/strong>. These are not automatically identical.<\/p>\n<p>The purchase description should identify the required bolting group and type, the applicable grade and style where specified, nominal diameter, length, thread configuration, finish and compatible components. Group, grade, type and style describe different aspects of the bolting system; one term should not silently substitute for another.<\/p>\n<p>Heavy-hex assemblies and spline-end systems, for example, can involve different component configurations and installation procedures. Similarly, nuts and washers must be selected as part of an applicable assembly rather than assumed interchangeable because their nominal thread sizes match.<\/p>\n<p>Washer requirements deserve particular attention. RCSC Section 6 distinguishes washer provisions according to the connection, bolting components, installation method, hole geometry and other relevant conditions. Neither &#8220;always include one washer&#8221; nor &#8220;washers are unnecessary for high-strength bolts&#8221; is a reliable universal procurement instruction.<\/p>\n<p>Coating also affects assembly compatibility. The surface treatment, mating nut condition and lubrication can influence installation behavior. A supplier&#8217;s quotation should clearly identify the approved coated or uncoated component configuration instead of combining components with unverified compatibility.<\/p>\n<h3>Product test reports do not establish installed-joint compliance<\/h3>\n<p>RCSC 2025 Section 2.9 requires test reports documenting conformance of the applicable bolting components and matched assemblies to be available to the EOR and inspector before assembly or erection.<\/p>\n<p>These reports serve a different purpose from field installation records.<\/p>\n<p>A manufacturer&#8217;s product report can support identification and conformity of supplied components. It does not prove that a contractor used the required installation procedure, achieved the required pretension, or inspected the faying surfaces before assembling a slip-critical joint.<\/p>\n<p>For snug-tightened joints, RCSC Sections 8.1 and 9.1 govern the corresponding installation and inspection requirements. Pretensioned joints bring in the applicable pre-installation verification, pretensioning and inspection provisions of Sections 7, 8.2 and 9.2.<\/p>\n<p>Slip-critical joints require the applicable pretensioned-joint procedures plus the additional faying-surface verification defined in Section 9.3. The surfaces must be visually verified against Section 3.2.2 before assembly, when those surfaces are still accessible.<\/p>\n<p>An inspection conducted only after the splice has been fully assembled cannot be treated as an equivalent substitute for the specified preassembly surface check.<\/p>\n<h3>Do not specify installation by a generic torque value<\/h3>\n<p>A fixed tightening torque is not a reliable standalone proof that a structural bolting assembly has achieved the required pretension. The torque\u2013pretension relationship depends on the actual assembly, friction, coating, lubrication and installation conditions.<\/p>\n<p>RCSC 2025 recognizes turn-of-nut, twist-off tension-control, direct-tension-indicator and combined methods in its pretensioning provisions. The 2025 revision withdrew the calibrated-wrench method as an independent pretensioning method. That change does not prohibit every use of a calibrated torque tool; torque is still involved in specified procedures, including the combined method and certain arbitration provisions.<\/p>\n<p>For procurement, the necessary distinction is that the selected bolting assemblies must support the project&#8217;s specified and permitted installation approach. The contractor remains responsible for the applicable procedures, pre-installation verification and installation inspection.<\/p>\n<p>A bolt supplier should not be asked to certify field pretension or final joint compliance when the supplier has not performed and controlled those activities.<\/p>\n<h2 id=\"how-to-write-an-rfq-without-changing-the-approved-joint-design\">How to Write an RFQ Without Changing the Approved Joint Design<\/h2>\n<p>A useful structural bolt RFQ translates the approved connection requirements into purchasable components while keeping design approval, manufacturing evidence and site installation responsibilities separate.<\/p>\n<p class=\"sunhy-engineering-example sunhy-added\" data-example=\"2\">In a hypothetical RFQ, the buyer specifies a slip-critical connection but supplies no surface preparation or installation requirements. The bolt supplier cannot infer those project controls from diameter and grade. Obtain the connection specification, separate steelwork and fastener responsibilities and define the required <a href=\"https:\/\/sunhyings.com\/blog\/traceability-for-automotive-fasteners\/\">inspection and traceability records<\/a> before comparing offers.<\/p>\n\n<p>The following matrix is a practical procurement aid derived from the responsibility structure in RCSC 2025. It is not a replacement for the governing specification or an official RCSC order form.<\/p>\n<div class=\"sunhy-table-wrap\" role=\"region\" aria-label=\"Structural bolting RFQ responsibility matrix\" tabindex=\"0\"><table>\n<thead><tr><th scope=\"col\">RFQ information<\/th><th scope=\"col\">Responsible source or party<\/th><th scope=\"col\">What the buyer must verify<\/th><\/tr><\/thead>\n<tbody>\n<tr><td>Governing drawing, revision and specification<\/td><td>EOR \/ project contract documents<\/td><td>Quotation uses the correct revision and applicable standard edition<\/td><\/tr>\n<tr><td>Joint type and slip-resistance class<\/td><td>EOR<\/td><td>ST, PT or SC designation is clear; SC surface class is specified<\/td><\/tr>\n<tr><td>Hole arrangement and thread position<\/td><td>Approved design and fabrication drawings<\/td><td>Hole type, permitted orientation and thread exclusion conditions agree with the design<\/td><\/tr>\n<tr><td>Bolting group, type, grade and style<\/td><td>EOR requirements and applicable product specification<\/td><td>Supplier offers the specified or approved configuration, not an assumed substitute<\/td><\/tr>\n<tr><td>Diameter, length and assembly geometry<\/td><td>Approved connection details and fabrication requirements<\/td><td>Actual grip, washer arrangement and thread configuration are accounted for<\/td><\/tr>\n<tr><td>Bolt and matching component finishes<\/td><td>EOR requirements and supplier component data<\/td><td>Bolt, nut and washer coatings and compatibility are documented as applicable<\/td><\/tr>\n<tr><td>Faying-surface treatment, if SC<\/td><td>EOR requirements; steel fabricator\/coating applicator evidence<\/td><td>Class, surface preparation, qualification and curing conditions match the approved design<\/td><\/tr>\n<tr><td>Installation and pre-installation verification<\/td><td>Contractor under the governing specification<\/td><td>Proposed components are suitable for the specified installation method; contractor owns field execution<\/td><\/tr>\n<tr><td>Product reports and joint inspection records<\/td><td>Supplier\/manufacturer for component reports; contractor\/inspector for field evidence<\/td><td>Required evidence is identified by responsible party and made available at the appropriate stage<\/td><\/tr>\n<\/tbody><\/table><\/div>\n<p>The table deliberately separates <strong>bolt assembly coating<\/strong> from <strong>faying-surface coating<\/strong>. These items may be purchased from different organizations and verified through different documents.<\/p>\n<p>Likewise, a supplier can quote a complete matched bolting assembly without having responsibility for preparing the connected steel surfaces. The buyer should coordinate that interface with the steelwork package rather than invent a universal fastener-supplier acceptance certificate.<\/p>\n<h3>What if the quotation and approved drawing do not agree?<\/h3>\n<p>A quotation that matches the nominal bolt diameter but changes the grade, type, style, coating or mating components is not automatically equivalent. The appropriate response depends on whether the change is permitted by the governing documents or requires an engineering approval.<\/p>\n<p>If the joint is marked slip-critical but the surface class is missing, the buyer should return the issue for design clarification before making an assumption. If the surface class is known but the fabricator cannot demonstrate that the proposed treatment meets it, the discrepancy belongs in the steelwork and coating approval process.<\/p>\n<p>Where RCSC 2025 Section 1.6.3 requires written EOR approval, a verbal assurance or supplier catalog comparison does not replace it. The buyer should retain the relevant approval reference with the final purchasing documents.<\/p>\n<p>For the bolt package itself, an RFQ should request the approved specification, group\/type and any specified grade\/style, dimensions, compatible nuts and washers, finish, quantities, and the applicable conformance reports. It should also identify any proposed deviations so they can be resolved before supply rather than discovered during receiving inspection or erection.<\/p>\n<p>The central purchasing decision is straightforward: <strong>do not replace a missing connection-design requirement with a stronger bolt, an assumed friction value or an unapproved coating.<\/strong> Obtain the design clarification, then purchase and verify the components against that approved basis.<\/p>\n<aside class=\"sunhy-procurement-note sunhy-added\"><p>If you are preparing a structural bolting RFQ, provide the relevant drawing revision, specified joint type, bolt assembly requirements and any applicable coating or inspection requirements when <a href=\"https:\/\/sunhyings.com\/contact-us\/\">requesting a specification review<\/a>. Product availability, documentation scope and supply suitability still require confirmation for the actual inquiry.<\/p><\/aside>\n<p><strong>Technical basis:<\/strong> The engineering distinctions and responsibility boundaries in this article are based primarily on the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.boltcouncil.org\/files\/2025RCSCSpecification.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer nofollow\">RCSC Specification for Structural Joints Using High-Strength Bolts, June 5, 2025<\/a>, particularly Sections 1.6\u20131.7, 2.9, 3.2\u20133.3, 4\u20135 and 7\u20139. Product-standard identity is referenced against the <a href=\"https:\/\/store.astm.org\/f3125_f3125m-26.html\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer nofollow\">ASTM F3125\/F3125M-26 publisher catalog<\/a>. Contractual edition, design and acceptance requirements must be confirmed for the individual project.<\/p>\n<aside class=\"sunhy-related-reading sunhy-added\" aria-label=\"Related technical reading\"><p class=\"sunhy-box-label\">Related technical reading<\/p><ul><li><a href=\"https:\/\/sunhyings.com\/fasteners\/bolts\/structural-bolts\/\">Structural bolt specification and enquiry<\/a><\/li><li><a href=\"https:\/\/sunhyings.com\/blog\/hex-nut-grades-explained\/\">Hex nut grades and selection checks<\/a><\/li><li><a href=\"https:\/\/sunhyings.com\/blog\/understanding-bolt-grades\/\">Bolt grades and strength terminology<\/a><\/li><\/ul><\/aside>\n<section class=\"sunhy-faq sunhy-added\" aria-labelledby=\"sunhy-faq-14607\"><h2 id=\"sunhy-faq-14607\">Frequently asked questions<\/h2><details><summary>Are bearing-type and slip-critical different bolt grades?<\/summary><p>No. They describe connection behavior and requirements. The approved design determines the necessary bolting assembly, installation and surface conditions.<\/p><\/details><details><summary>Does pretension alone make a connection slip-critical?<\/summary><p>No. The joint must satisfy its full design and faying-surface requirements as well as the specified installation and inspection basis.<\/p><\/details><details><summary>What should a buyer communicate for a slip-critical joint?<\/summary><p>Provide the approved connection and surface requirements, bolt assembly, installation basis and required inspection records rather than only grade and size.<\/p><\/details><\/section>\n<\/article>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\">{\"@context\": \"https:\/\/schema.org\", \"@type\": \"FAQPage\", \"@id\": \"https:\/\/sunhyings.com\/blog\/bearing-type-vs-slip-critical-structural-connections-what-buyers-must-specify\/#faq\", \"mainEntity\": [{\"@type\": \"Question\", \"name\": \"Are bearing-type and slip-critical different bolt grades?\", \"acceptedAnswer\": {\"@type\": \"Answer\", \"text\": \"No. They describe connection behavior and requirements. The approved design determines the necessary bolting assembly, installation and surface conditions.\"}}, {\"@type\": \"Question\", \"name\": \"Does pretension alone make a connection slip-critical?\", \"acceptedAnswer\": {\"@type\": \"Answer\", \"text\": \"No. The joint must satisfy its full design and faying-surface requirements as well as the specified installation and inspection basis.\"}}, {\"@type\": \"Question\", \"name\": \"What should a buyer communicate for a slip-critical joint?\", \"acceptedAnswer\": {\"@type\": \"Answer\", \"text\": \"Provide the approved connection and surface requirements, bolt assembly, installation basis and required inspection records rather than only grade and size.\"}}]}<\/script>\n\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Comparez les assemblages structuraux de type porteur et \u00e0 frottement, y compris la pr\u00e9contrainte, les surfaces de contact, le contr\u00f4le et les \u00e9l\u00e9ments de la demande de devis que les acheteurs doivent confirmer.<\/p>","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":14638,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[35],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-14607","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-selection-comparison"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/sunhyings.com\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/14607","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/sunhyings.com\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/sunhyings.com\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/sunhyings.com\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/sunhyings.com\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=14607"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/sunhyings.com\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/14607\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":14705,"href":"https:\/\/sunhyings.com\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/14607\/revisions\/14705"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/sunhyings.com\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/14638"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/sunhyings.com\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=14607"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/sunhyings.com\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=14607"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/sunhyings.com\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=14607"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}